Category 6
Grief in the brain: accepting the longing without a scan to explain it
How do I accept a feeling like longing when my mind keeps reaching for someone?
The short answer
Longing is the mind reaching for someone or something that mattered, and like any feeling it makes sense without a brain scan to explain it. No scan has settled why it happens, and no scan gets to label you. Meeting a feeling with kindness, instead of fighting it, is where self-acceptance starts.
If reaching for them has turned into wanting not to be alive, or you cannot tell, please reach someone now. The help box near the end of this page says how.
Where the reward idea comes from
How it works
Longing is one of the plainest feelings there is, and after a death it is the most honest part of grief. When someone has mattered, the mind keeps reaching for them: a voice, a habit, a question you would have asked. The wanting does not switch off because they cannot come back.
You may have read that grief is a kind of addiction, or that the brain craves the person who died. It is easy to see why that idea spreads. It offers a mechanism, and a picture from a brain scanner looks like proof. It does not deserve the weight it gets.
All of the brain research here is about grief after a death. The study most often behind the idea that grief engages the brain's reward system scanned a small group of bereaved women. Some had grief that had stayed intense, by the researchers' interview criteria, and some did not. In the scanner, they saw words drawn from their own account of the death.
In the women whose grief had stayed intense, those words raised activity in the nucleus accumbens, an area linked to reward, and across the whole group that activity rose with how much yearning they reported. The authors described the response as craving-like, not pleasant.
Why a scan should not label you
Why it matters
Anyone who has heard their longing called an addiction should know this: the science has not confirmed it.
- When the same research group tried to repeat the finding with older adults whose spouse had died, the difference did not appear.
- A systematic review judged the evidence "consistent with, though not confirmative of" a reward account, and found most of the brain-scan studies small.
- A more recent review found grief linked to brain networks for emotion, reward and control, and its authors say grief's mechanisms "remain poorly understood".
This research is interesting, and the people doing it deserve respect. The trouble starts when it reaches a grieving person, or anyone carrying a strong feeling, as a verdict. Calling longing an addiction turns a feeling into a fault, and a fault is something people fight or hide. What gets fought or hidden is what stays stuck.
Longing is not a malfunction. It sits close to the centre of grief. In one US study that followed bereaved adults over two years, yearning for the person was the dominant painful feeling throughout.
There is no right amount of connection to keep. A review of research on ongoing bonds found that a sense of connection with someone who died brings comfort, distress or both, and could not confirm that keeping a bond is better than letting go.
Four ways the brain story can get in the way
Where people get stuck
- Reading a scan as a verdict on you. A lit-up area in a small group does not explain any one person's feelings. It should never stand in for yours.
- Hearing "addiction" as a judgment. The original paper's own title asked "Craving love?". Reading craving from activity in one area works backward from a brain area to a feeling, which researchers call a reverse inference. Longing deserves kinder words than that.
- Waiting for an explanation before accepting the feeling. The researchers themselves say grief's brain mechanisms are poorly understood. Accepting your longing, or any feeling, does not need to wait on them.
- Treating a sense of connection as a problem. For some people a continuing sense of the person is a comfort; for others it hurts. Both are allowed, and neither is a sign you are doing grief wrong.
When longing, or any feeling, is worth taking to someone
Any feeling that stays intense for a long time and gets in the way of daily life is worth taking to a doctor or a therapist.
If longing has stayed intense for a long time and gets in the way of daily life, grief-focused therapy exists and has helped people in a trial. A doctor or a therapist who works with grief can help you find it.
Sometimes wanting to be with them means not wanting to be alive. If that is where you are, or you cannot tell, please reach someone now. The help box near the end of this page says how. For immediate danger, contact local emergency services.
A feeling does not need a scan to make sense
In my view
Longing is love with nowhere to go. When the mind keeps reaching for someone, it is reaching for a person it loved and for what they gave: being known, being safe, being someone's person. It reaches, too, for the future it was still expecting with them, a future that did not happen. Sometimes it reaches past them too, into older longings a person has carried for years without ever feeling them through. Either way, longing, like any feeling, is something worth feeling first, not a symptom to be argued with. When it has stayed intense for a long time and is getting in the way of life, that is when I would take it to someone.
Here is what I would tell you: stop arguing with it. Let the longing be what it is, without arguing with it or trying to fix it, and be as kind to yourself in it as you would be to a friend who missed someone. Accepting it is not the same as being fine, and it is not letting go of the person.
Longing is not a fault to fight. It is a feeling asking to be felt.
When longing is felt instead of fought, it stops standing between a person and the rest of their life. That is self-acceptance, and it is where the energy to keep living a full life comes back from.
One thing is plain: wanting to be with someone who has died is different from wanting not to be alive. When the two blur, that is the moment to reach a person, not to work it out alone. The help box near the end of this page says how.
Where the research on longing and the brain is thin
Where the research is thin, or disagrees
Researchers disagree on whether the reward system plays a special part in longing after a loss: one small study found a sign of it, and a repeat did not. The imaging studies are small, often from one research group, and they show links, not causes. No study I found tests how a person comes to accept longing, and all of these studies are about grief after a death, not separation, estrangement or other feelings.
Noticing what the mind reaches for
One thing you might notice
The next time your mind reaches for someone or something, you might notice what it reaches for: a voice, a habit, a question you would have asked them. It is only noticing, not homework.
What a session does with longing
How Feelings Buddy fits
Feelings Buddy is built for working through feelings with self-compassion, toward self-acceptance and self-motivation. A hard feeling is the obstacle, not the destination.
The brain research above did not shape a session's instructions, and a session does not work on the brain. A session is an AI working from written instructions, so it can get them wrong. Its instructions say to:
- never add a detail, a feeling or a fact the person has not given, and offer any connection only as a question they can wave away;
- treat longing as a possible risk signal: when someone says something like "I just want to be with them", ask once, plainly, whether they are having thoughts of suicide or of not wanting to be alive.
There is no diagnosis, and a session carries nothing about risk into a later session. No one reads the conversation as it happens.
No study has tested Feelings Buddy. How a session works, step by step
Frequently asked questions
Is my longing a kind of addiction?
No, and nobody gets to call it that. One small brain-scan study linked reminders of the person who died to activity in a reward-related area, in women whose grief had stayed intense. When the same research group tried to repeat it, the difference did not appear, and a later review called the evidence consistent with a reward account, not confirming it.
Does longing mean something is wrong with my brain?
No. Brain-imaging studies of grief are mostly small and describe groups rather than any one person, and a recent review says grief's brain mechanisms are still poorly understood. Longing for someone who mattered is what grief mostly feels like, not a sign that something in you is broken.
Can I accept a feeling without understanding it?
Yes. Longing for someone who mattered makes sense on its own terms, like any feeling, and accepting it does not need a brain scan to explain it first. In one US study that followed bereaved adults over two years, yearning was the dominant painful feeling throughout. Here is what I would tell you: let it be there, and be kind to yourself while it is. If wanting to be with them has turned into not wanting to be alive, or you cannot tell, please reach someone now; the help box on this page says how.
Is it all right to still feel connected to them?
Yes. Both holding on and letting go are allowed. A review of research on ongoing bonds found that a sense of connection with someone who died brings comfort, distress or both, and could not confirm that keeping a bond is better than letting go. If wanting to be with them has turned into not wanting to be alive, or you cannot tell, please reach someone now; the help box on this page says how.
When is longing, or any feeling, worth taking to someone?
When it has stayed intense for a long time and gets in the way of daily life, I would reach for help. Grief-focused therapy exists and has helped people in a trial, and a doctor or a therapist who works with grief can help you find it. Any other feeling that has stayed that heavy is worth taking to a doctor or a therapist too. If longing has turned into not wanting to be alive, or you cannot tell, please reach someone now; the help box on this page says how.
If this is heavier than an article can hold. Some grief needs a person, not a page. If it has stayed as heavy as the first weeks for a long time, if daily life has stopped working, or if you are thinking about not being alive, please reach someone now.
The crisis lines are at the foot of this page.
A family doctor, or a therapist who works with grief, can help you work out what kind of support fits.
Further reading (7 sources)
The tier and grade after each source come from my own evidence file, not an independent panel. The note under each source gives the study details the article leaves out.
-
O'Connor MF, Wellisch DK, Stanton AL, Eisenberger NI, Irwin MR, Lieberman MD (2008). Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain's reward center. NeuroImage 42(2), 969-972. DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.256. Tier 2, weak.
Note: 23 bereaved women whose mother or sister had died of breast cancer, 11 with grief that had stayed intense and 12 without, current psychiatric conditions excluded; group comparisons used a statistical threshold that a later review notes has high false-positive rates.
-
McConnell MH, Killgore WDS, O'Connor MF (2018). Yearning predicts subgenual anterior cingulate activity in bereaved individuals. Heliyon 4(10), e00852. DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00852. Tier 2, weak.
Note: 25 older adults, 16 of them bereaved after a spouse's death, mostly women, shown photographs of the spouse and of a stranger; the authors call their findings highly preliminary, and a failed repeat this small cannot show that no reward involvement exists.
-
Kakarala SE, Roberts KE, Rogers M, Coats T, Falzarano F, Gang J, Chilov M, Avery J, Maciejewski PK, Lichtenthal WG, Prigerson HG (2020). The Neurobiological Reward System in Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD): A Systematic Review. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 303, 111135. DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111135. Tier 1, moderate.
Note: 24 studies; in 15 of its 18 brain-scan studies fewer than 30 people took part, and five of the seven scan studies of lasting grief came from one research group; several authors set out to support the reward idea; the original result did not show up in the other studies it gathered, and it notes that imaging cannot show cause and effect and that the areas involved do many jobs besides reward.
-
Evstigneev SR, O'Connor MF, Wilhelm FH, Blum D, Slavich GM, Seiler A (2025). Grief and bereavement: A pre-registered systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 182, 106535. DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106535. Tier 1, moderate; abstract read.
Note: study count and sample sizes not stated in what I read; associations, not causes; one of its authors led sources 1 and 2.
-
Maciejewski PK, Zhang B, Block SD, Prigerson HG (2007). An empirical examination of the stage theory of grief. JAMA 297(7), 716-723. DOI 10.1001/jama.297.7.716. Tier 2, moderate; abstract read.
Note: 233 bereaved adults in one US state, after deaths from natural causes, followed from 1 to 24 months after the death; each feeling measured with a single item.
-
Hewson H, Galbraith N, Jones C, Heath G (2023). The impact of continuing bonds following bereavement: A systematic review. Death Studies 48(10), 1001-1014. DOI 10.1080/07481187.2023.2223593. Tier 1, moderate; abstract read.
Note: a review of 79 studies.
-
Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds CF (2005). Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 293(21). DOI 10.1001/jama.293.21.2601. Tier 2, moderate.
Note: one randomized trial with 95 participants, 83 of them women, at one clinic and its community satellite.
Updated 2026-10-06.