Category 3
Keeping busy after a loss: rest, avoidance and getting going again
How do I know whether keeping busy is moving me forward or keeping a feeling in the way?
The short answer
Here is what I would tell you: a break you come back from is part of getting going again. What keeps a hard feeling in the way is steering around the feeling itself. In studies of grief that stays intense after a death, avoiding painful memories and feelings went with grief that lasts longer and weighs more.
If grief has stayed very heavy or daily life has stopped working, a doctor or a therapist who works with grief is worth reaching. The same goes for any feeling that has stayed that heavy. If you are thinking about not being alive, please reach someone now. The help box near the end of this page says how.
Not all stepping away is the same
How it works
A common question is whether keeping busy, after a loss or through any hard stretch, is a way of not dealing with it. The question is not how busy you are. It is whether you can come back to the feeling when you choose.
One model of coping after a death, the dual process model, describes coping as moving between the loss itself and rebuilding daily life, and counts time off from both as part of coping. A walk, a day at work, a film that makes you laugh: none of these needs a study to be allowed. Grief comes in waves covers the model in more detail.
Three terms come up below, all from studies of bereaved people. Experiential avoidance means avoiding painful memories and feelings about the loss. Rumination means going over the loss again and again. Complicated grief is a clinical term for grief that stays intense and impairing, not ordinary grief.
What steering around grief keeps in place
Why it matters
A hard feeling starts with something that mattered: a person, a plan, a future you wanted. Grief is the plainest case, love for what is no longer here and a wanted future that did not happen, and a real loss is worth feeling for that reason alone. Sometimes a hard feeling is also an entry point: a loss or a setback can press on older hurts that were never fully felt, and the patterns built around those hurts run a life until someone feels what is under them. Either way, steering around the feeling keeps a person from what happened, and where old hurts are stirred, it keeps the old pattern in charge.
The studies below are all about grief after a death. The largest source here, a review of studies of bereaved people, linked experiential avoidance and rumination with grief that lasts longer and weighs more, and the authors call that evidence strong. In one study that surveyed bereaved adults three times, avoiding painful memories and feelings helped explain why going over a loss again and again went with heavier grief later, while avoiding the reality of the loss did not carry that link.
People can know the facts of a loss perfectly well and still keep the feeling at arm's length. Going over a loss in your head is not the same as feeling it, and rumination is often a way of staying near the loss without letting it land.
In a study in the United States and Hong Kong, people whose grief after a spouse's death had stayed intense rated their ability to look forward, such as keeping plans, staying optimistic and laughing, lower than bereaved people without it and married people, and rated their flexibility lower as well.
Flexibility is what processing builds: the freedom to turn toward a feeling, and then turn back toward your life.
Four places stepping away gets stuck
Where people get stuck
- Treating every break as avoidance. A break you come back from is part of processing, not a failure of it. The guilt about resting is often the heavier load.
- Steering around the feelings, not the facts. You can talk about a loss or a setback, plan around it, even manage its paperwork, and never let yourself feel it. That is where the old patterns keep their grip.
- Holding on and pushing away at once. In one study of bereaved adults, the heaviest grief was in the group where moving toward the loss, through yearning, going over it or seeking closeness to the person who died, happened together with avoiding reminders of it; behaviour that kept a bond with the person who died did not go with avoidance. Reaching for the person and bracing against the pain in the same breath is the classic stuck pattern.
- Feeling guilty for a good moment. In one study of people whose spouse had died, smiles and other positive expressions, while they described the relationship, predicted less grief later, and negative expressions, especially anger, predicted more; in another study of bereaved adults, genuine laughter went with less anger and better relations with others. Smiling or not smiling is no sign of grieving right or wrong. A good moment is not a betrayal of the person you lost.
When avoidance is worth taking to someone
Steering around any feeling for a long time, until daily life stops working, is worth taking to a doctor or a therapist.
A break someone comes back from is different from steering around every reminder of a loss, and every feeling about it, for a long time. The second is worth taking to a therapist who works with grief. Where grief stays intense, grief-focused therapy exists and has helped some people in a trial: Working through grief.
If you are thinking about not being alive, please reach someone now. The help box near the end of this page says how. For immediate danger, contact local emergency services.
Rest is part of getting going again
In my view
Rest after a loss, or through any hard stretch, is good, the way sleep is good, or a meal when you have not eaten, and none of it is a verdict on how much someone cared.
The trouble is narrower. It starts when every feeling has to be kept out, when the busyness is not rest but a wall. Behind that wall sits whatever mattered: the love you had for what is gone, a plan that fell through, and sometimes older hurts that what happened has stirred. A full calendar does not make any of it go away. It comes out sideways, as a short fuse, numbness, or the same argument with a different person.
A hard feeling is something to come back to and move through. Stepping away now and then is not running from it; never coming back is.
When you do come back to the feeling, with the kindness you would give a friend, something frees up. The energy that went into holding the wall goes back into your life. That is where self-motivation comes from. It is not willpower. It is the wanting that returns when you are no longer at war with your own feelings, and that is healthy-adult living.
The test I use is simple: can you come back to the feeling when you choose? If you cannot, or every feeling has to be kept out, that is worth taking to someone, gently and without shame.
Where the research on avoidance is thin
Where the research is thin, or disagrees
Most of this evidence comes from surveys of people whose grief stayed intense, read mostly from abstracts, with narrow samples, two of them mostly women, and self-reported avoidance; surveys like these cannot show that avoidance makes grief last, laboratory results were mixed, and "strong evidence" is one review's own label. Several studies measured one point in time, and the smile and laughter findings are prediction, not cause: people already coping well may simply have smiled more. No study here measured keeping busy itself or drew the line where a break ends, and almost all of this evidence is about a death, often of a spouse, so none of it studies steering around anger, disappointment or regret outside grief.
Noticing how a day sits
One thing you might notice
The next time part of a day passes with little thought of what has been hard, you might notice how it sits afterwards: lighter, uneasy, or nothing much. Any of those is information, not a verdict. If noticing makes it heavier, you can stop.
What a session does with stepping away
How Feelings Buddy fits
Feelings Buddy is built for working through feelings with self-compassion, toward self-acceptance and self-motivation. A hard feeling is the obstacle, not the destination.
A session is an AI working from written instructions, so it can get them wrong. Its instructions say to:
- let the person lead, and if they say "not today", say so warmly and close;
- ask for one specific moment rather than the whole story.
The studies above link avoidance with heavier grief, but none tested pressing someone to stop, so a session does not press toward what a person steps away from. That is my judgement call, and a session cannot tell a break from avoidance that has gone on for a long time.
There is no diagnosis, and a session carries nothing about risk into a later session. No one reads the conversation as it happens.
No study has tested Feelings Buddy. How a session works, step by step
Frequently asked questions
Can keeping busy be part of getting going again?
Yes. A break you come back from is part of processing. One model of coping after a death, the dual process model, counts time on daily life as part of coping. The trouble is narrower: steering around every feeling. With a loss, research on intense grief after a death has linked doing that with grief that lasts longer and weighs more.
Can steering around a painful feeling keep it in the way?
It can. The evidence is about a loss: one review of studies of bereaved people linked avoiding painful memories and feelings about a loss, and going over it again and again, with grief that lasts longer and weighs more; surveys like these cannot show which causes which. A real loss left unfelt holds grief in place.
How do I tell a break from avoidance?
The test is simple: can you come back to the feeling when you choose? A break you come back from is different from steering around every reminder of a loss, and every feeling about it, for a long time. The second is worth taking to a therapist who works with grief. The same goes for steering around any feeling for that long.
Can I let myself laugh or feel good after a loss?
Yes. In two studies of bereaved adults, laughter and smiling occurred during grief; genuine laughter went with less anger and better relations with others, and positive expressions went with less grief later. A good moment is not a betrayal of the person you lost.
When is steering around a feeling worth taking to someone?
When steering around every reminder and every feeling has gone on for a long time, or daily life has stopped working, reach a therapist who works with grief. The same goes for any feeling you have steered around that long; a doctor or a therapist can help. Where grief stays intense, grief-focused therapy exists and has helped some people in a trial. If you are thinking about not being alive, please reach someone now; the help box on this page says how.
If this is heavier than an article can hold. Some grief needs a person, not a page. If it has stayed as heavy as the first weeks for a long time, if daily life has stopped working, or if you are thinking about not being alive, please reach someone now.
The crisis lines are at the foot of this page.
A family doctor, or a therapist who works with grief, can help you work out what kind of support fits.
Further reading (8 sources)
The tier and grade after each source come from my own evidence file, not an independent panel. The note under each source gives the study details the article leaves out.
-
Stroebe MS, Schut HAW (1999). The Dual Process Model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies 23(3), 197-224. DOI 10.1080/074811899201046. Tier 2, weak; abstract read.
Note: a theoretical model, not a tested finding.
-
Eisma MC, Stroebe MS (2021; published online 2020). Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review. Behavior Therapy 52(1). DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2020.04.004. Tier 1, moderate; abstract read.
Note: 64 studies covering 7,715 bereaved people; about complicated grief, not ordinary grief; it covered many ways of handling emotion after a loss, from avoidance to mindfulness; effect sizes not read.
-
Eisma MC, Stroebe MS, Schut HA, Stroebe W, Boelen PA, van den Bout J (2013). Avoidance processes mediate the relationship between rumination and symptoms of complicated grief and depression following loss. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 122(4), 961-970. DOI 10.1037/a0034051. Tier 2, moderate; abstract read.
Note: 282 bereaved adults surveyed three times at 6-month intervals; 88% female and self-selected; all self-report. The authors suggest going over a loss may keep grief going partly through avoidance; their data are consistent with that chain, but they do not prove it.
-
Eisma MC, Lenferink LIM (2023). Co-occurrence of approach and avoidance in prolonged grief: a latent class analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology 14(2), 2190544. DOI 10.1080/20008066.2023.2190544. Tier 2, weak.
Note: 288 bereaved adults at one point in time, so it cannot say which came first; no group avoided without also approaching, and some distressed people approached without avoiding; 92% female, leaning toward higher education, with violent losses over-represented; yearning overlaps with the grief measure; avoidance was self-reported, and people may not be aware of their own.
-
Burton CL, Yan OH, Pat-Horenczyk R, Chan IS, Ho S, Bonanno GA (2011). Coping Flexibility and Complicated Grief: A Comparison of American and Chinese Samples. Depression and Anxiety 29(1), 16-22. DOI 10.1002/da.20888. Tier 2, weak.
Note: the groups with grief that had stayed intense held 23 people in the US and 16 in Hong Kong; one point in time; coping was rated on a scale built for trauma; flexibility meant moving between looking forward and staying with a hard event. The authors read the result as support for flexibility, not for any single style, and acknowledge that low forward-looking ability alone may drive the difference.
-
Bonanno GA, Keltner D (1997). Facial expressions of emotion and the course of conjugal bereavement. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106(1), 126-137. DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.106.1.126. Tier 2, weak; abstract read.
Note: expressions coded about six months after the death; positive expressions predicted less grief through 25 months, and anger more grief at 14 months; the abstract gives no sample size.
-
Keltner D, Bonanno GA (1997). A study of laughter and dissociation: distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(4), 687-702. DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.687. Tier 2, weak; abstract read.
Note: bereaved adults about six months after the loss, at one point in time; the abstract gives no sample size or type of loss.
-
Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds CF (2005). Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. DOI 10.1001/jama.293.21.2601. Tier 2, moderate.
Note: one randomized trial with 95 participants, 83 of them women; about half of those treated did not respond.
Updated 2026-10-06.